Making Your Case: The Art of Persuading Judges

This book is a fantastic product by America's wittiest Justice and one of the foremost legal writers today (Bryan was entrusted with revising the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure).

It is really a product that means different things to two different audiences. First, it serves as an exemplary checklist for the legal advocate. No matter what forum an attorney appears in - your local town adminstrative agency all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, this functions as a comprehensive checklist of things that we were taught in law school - and promptly forgot.

For the lay person, it offers more than just a highly entertaining read. First it demystifies the judicial process for a public whose perceptions of the justice system have been unfortunately based on half-baked Hollywood products, from L.A. Law to Ally McBeal.

But in the classical sense, it is also a treatise on decision making, rhetoric, and the balancing we all perform as humans. In this, it follows, perhaps consciously, the great classics to which it repeatedly alludes.

A great read.

Simply the best book on legal persuasive writing ever written.

Interesting, useful, fun, full of great anecdotes. Terrific discussion of statutory interpretation. Great references to scholarly classical treatises on rhetoric. This book is wonderful both for its analysis of oral argument and for its discussion of written forms of persuasion, like briefs. I wish I had had it earlier.

My only complaint is the same one I have with virtually all modern style manuals: they advocate a simplistic prose style, characterized by short, conversational sentences, avoiding unusual words, eschewing Latin phrases. But I personally often find prose that breaks these rules a refreshing change. I enjoy reading a word or phrase I rarely see but that is perfectly chosen. And I enjoy learning new words or phrases. This book would condemn two of the greatest legal prose stylists out there: John Marshall and Learned Hand, both of whose opinions often contained sentences that would not work so well conversationally, that were full of long, convoluted sentences and classical allusions. My sense is that in this joint work Justice Scalia, who can write rich and interesting prose, pushed back against some of the simplifying strictures of his co-author.

Furthermore, I think that often too much emphasis on simple words and sentences serves to make more complex ideas too difficult to express or to understand. Thus, the book (like most books) argues against "jargon," but jargon, once learned, is often a much clearer way of expressing something than a rephrasing.

And the Roe v. Wade anecdote is great! It explains a lot...

In any case, I am hardly qualified to criticize Justice Scalia, whose writing is far beyond my own. Anyway, this is a great book.

Lawyers please read this book. Not just for your edification; but for the benefit of the rest of us too.

Why do so many people think lawyers are jerks? Perhaps it's got something to do with the way lawyers are trained that leads some of them to believe that arrogance, rudeness and boorishness are the trifectas of success in their profession.

Apparently judges of all ilks - all the way up to Supreme Court Justices, have seen more than their fill of nasty advocate's behavior in their courtrooms. So have I.

For the past five years I've trained trial lawyers, and some of the behavior I've seen inside courtrooms has not just been appalling, it's been stupid. As a non-lawyer, I must say that the vast majority of lawyers are not deserving of the stereotype they've been tagged with. However, there's a tiny minority whose nasty words and deeds more than compensate for the polite professionalism of the majority of their peers.

Attention All Jerks: This book is for you. The most important aspect of this book may be the one you want to ignore; but pay attention to the primary theme that runs throughout it: Your spiteful, oafish and intemperate behavior in court, damages your prospects of winning. You aren't just harming your client. Your income is taking a beating too.

Although this book is packed with invaluable advice for litigators and transactional lawyers alike, there is no more important advice than in this sentence from the Introduction: "Your objective in every argument therefore, is to show yourself to be worthy of trust and affection."

Look, again at that sentence. Is there any business or profession in which that lesson would not be valuable? In fact, is there any business or personal relationship in which that lesson would not be valuable? That is why this book should be read by all advocates for any cause.

If every lawyer in this country - and the world, read this book and fully absorbed the power of that one simple lesson, the profession might begin to alter its image, which as been around since, well, at least since Dick the butcher voiced an attractive sounding idea in Henry IV, part Two, "The first thing we do, let's kill..."

I am not a lawyer, but I love reading about persuasion and influence. This book caught my attention out of left field, but it certainly added a lot of value to my understanding of persuasion from a logical and argumentative point of view.

Most of the books I've read on persuasion focus on the emotional appeals that move people and mention that you need to give a rational argument for the decision so the persuadee can feel good about it. This book teaches you how to make that rational argument, but it does more than that. It teaches you how to frame the argument before it is made so that it will be more persuasive when it is made. The portion focused on the development of the syllogism was particularly interesting.

Definitely a book that you will want to read whether your are in the legal arena or not - if you want to know how to influence and persuade.